I do not know why Western news agents use those photos to describe the "14th March" violent protest in Lhasa Tibet, China. they are ridiculous. and those photos do not ring any bell of the truth and mislead people who knows nothing.

see below how the city were burned and assholes were getting mad.

if you were in street of Lhasa on that moment, do you cry and shout for policeman to come and protect? see below:

Well, here comes the policeman. they are not described like what Western news said. please these are true photos, by far as I know, China police and military force did not fight a single weapon and did not beat or kill any violent protesters, Although I think the assholes are deserved to be killed on the street.

Some Western news reporters do not make any news on how wrong China was doing but use your consciousness to write the report. OR God will let the time backspin and put you on the street of Lhasa. I dare you. I really dare you still make up bullshit stories on it.

======================

"CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country."

quote from http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/03/28/tibet.statement/

WHAT A HECK IS THAT "ONLY TWO INSTANCES". how about 'China Daily' makes two instances of  "California is a county in P.R China". Does it sound exactly same ridiculous as it????

how dare you use "ONLY two", if not, how many do you expect? 100? 1000? or what? it does not matter how many actually the "instance" happened, but if you are a new agent then tell the truth. if you can't reveal the truth,

then piss off and be a novel writer rather than a news reporter.

also, in CNN's statement, it said that CNN is singled out. well, please read carefully the Anti-CNN's page content. CNN is not that important for anti-cnn.com to single out. anti-cnn just treats CNN this world well-known liar/news-agent as representative of all world liars, since CNN sounds kinda reputable in liar community. and i would say "sorry" that anti-cnn.com chooses CNN as a representative, but definitely CNN is not singled out, and only chosen as a representative. i think CNN actually does not realize that. so again in the first sentence of its statement, it just shows that it misunderstands the whole thing.